Comments on: Shoes! Shoes! Shoes!
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes/
Comments on MetaFilter post Shoes! Shoes! Shoes!Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:56:50 -0800Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:56:50 -0800en-ushttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss60Shoes! Shoes! Shoes!
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes
<a href="http://www.centuryinshoes.com/">Solemates: The Century in Shoes</a> is the most ridiculously well developed site on shoes I have ever seen. Journey through the decades with advertisements, movie clips, well-researched history, and most importantly -- 360 degree Quicktime views of shoes. How many shoes have you collected over the years? Do you still wear them? Why do women have to buy so many anyway? Are you more concerned with comfort or style now? Of course, I'm still saving up to buy some of those Fish Tank <a href="http://secure.hostasaurus.com/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=pdcom&Product_Code=PD-PL-FISH-WH&Category_Code=FT">platform shoes</a> from <i>I'm Gonna Git You Sucka.</i>post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:36:57 -0800Stan ChincostumehistoryshoesadvertisementsBy: snez
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422355
That is a ridiculously well developed site. I kept expecting to see an ad saying this site brought to you by Nike or something like that. I'm so used to seeing strange obsessions done GeoCities style. For a companion piece check out <a href="http://www.operagloves.com/glovmain.html">For the Love of Opera Gloves</a> with its dozens of <a href="http://www.operagloves.com/whatsnew.html">galleries</a>. The person behind the site even has his own <a href="http://operagloves.blogspot.com/">blog</a> on opera gloves. Oh, and I've also always wanted some fish tank shoes. Thanks Stan!comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422355Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:56:50 -0800snezBy: aacheson
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422356
What an amazing site! Great link Stan Chin!
Shoes didn't change all that much from the 1930's to the 1950's. The 1990's shoes are friggin ugly. Is it just me, or did it appear that women had much smaller feet in 1900?comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422356Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:59:29 -0800aachesonBy: gravelshoes
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422369
<small> must...resist...urge...to...send...link...to...ex-girlfriend</small>comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422369Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:34:38 -0800gravelshoesBy: stonerose
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422370
If you're in Toronto, you might want to visit the <a href="http://www.batashoemuseum.ca/">Bata Shoe Museum</a>. It's a great building, and the website is worth a look, too.comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422370Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:34:58 -0800stoneroseBy: rainbaby
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422373
This is heaven. Being well shod is the first step in being well dressed. aacheson - People have gotten taller and fatter on average since 1900 - that may explain it.comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422373Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:40:28 -0800rainbabyBy: jennyb
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422405
<i>Is it just me, or did it appear that women had much smaller feet in 1900?</i>
From the site:
"Early in the decade, all the fussing with the top portion of the body also caused people to develop a preference for narrow feet, believed to be a sign of breeding and gentility. Both men and women regularly wore shoes that were a full size too small. Some women even opted to have their little toes removed to achieve narrower feet."
As an unapologetic shoe junkie, I must say this is a wonderful site. Great link, Stan!comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422405Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:23:22 -0800jennybBy: riffola
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422437
Calling Lance Arthur.comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422437Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:02:50 -0800riffolaBy: yeahyeahyeahwhoo
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422444
once the 'toes worn through' look gets hot, I'll be lookin at a closet full of gold!comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422444Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:12:32 -0800yeahyeahyeahwhooBy: SweetIceT
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422642
as another shoe aholic....I must say that I just love how sexy those shoes from the fifties were...comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422642Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:25:33 -0800SweetIceTBy: madamjujujive
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422651
Stan, I love this shoe site - thanks!
I saw a great shoe exhibit at the Musée de la Civilisation in Quebec this summer, and was collecting a few links for a possible post... so let me throw my finds into the mix, too. They aren't as contemporary or as in depth as your post, but still rather fun. This one is a fascinating single page site from the <a href="http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/dept/physio/podiatry/history.html">podiatry department</a> at the University of Technology in Perth that shows some medieval shoes, including the origins of platform shoes and high heels. And this <a href="http://www.shoeinfonet.com/history/usm/hi_shoes.htm">illustrated shoe history</a> is really pretty interesting too, with an emphasis on ancient and medieval footwear.comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422651Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:53:14 -0800madamjujujiveBy: jonmc
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422694
<i>Being well shod is the first step in being well dressed.</i>
Which is why I wear only the <a href="http://www.chucksconnection.com/">Canvas Cadillac...</a>...and <a href="http://www.classicsportsshoes.com/conallstarch32.html">this model</a> is next on my list..comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422694Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:50:53 -0800jonmcBy: TurkishGolds
http://www.metafilter.com/23054/Shoes-Shoes-Shoes#422721
Thank you, Stan Chin, for posting this site. It is a dream as well as an inspiration to me. The '60s yellow shoes are the most wonderful thing produced by American culture in the last century, truly.comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23054-422721Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:17:24 -0800TurkishGolds
¡°Why?¡± asked Larry, in his practical way. "Sergeant," admonished the Lieutenant, "you mustn't use such language to your men." "Yes," accorded Shorty; "we'll git some rations from camp by this evenin'. Cap will look out for that. Meanwhile, I'll take out two or three o' the boys on a scout into the country, to see if we can't pick up something to eat." Marvor, however, didn't seem satisfied. "The masters always speak truth," he said. "Is this what you tell me?" MRS. B.: Why are they let, then? My song is short. I am near the dead. So Albert's letter remained unanswered¡ªCaro felt that Reuben was unjust. She had grown very critical of him lately, and a smarting dislike coloured her [Pg 337]judgments. After all, it was he who had driven everybody to whatever it was that had disgraced him. He was to blame for Robert's theft, for Albert's treachery, for Richard's base dependence on the Bardons, for George's death, for Benjamin's disappearance, for Tilly's marriage, for Rose's elopement¡ªit was a heavy load, but Caro put the whole of it on Reuben's shoulders, and added, moreover, the tragedy of her own warped life. He was a tyrant, who sucked his children's blood, and cursed them when they succeeded in breaking free. "Tell my lord," said Calverley, "I will attend him instantly." HoME²Ô¾®¿Õ·¬ºÅѸÀ×Á´½Ó
ENTER NUMBET 0017 www.rumlax.com.cn zoula5.com.cn liuqu0.net.cn zouju3.net.cn www.lailu6.net.cn churi3.com.cn 862675.org.cn www.avxcx.com.cn huizu0.com.cn 0852lvshi.org.cn