²Ô¾®¿Õ·¬ºÅѸÀ×Á´½Ó

    1. <form id=VHjPPVrdo><nobr id=VHjPPVrdo></nobr></form>
      <address id=VHjPPVrdo><nobr id=VHjPPVrdo><nobr id=VHjPPVrdo></nobr></nobr></address>

      *** Voting for the MeFiCoFo Board has begun! ***
      September General Site Update | 9/27 MeFiCoFo Board Update

      ¡°...furthering the disenfranchisement of LGBT people on-screen,¡±
      July 8, 2018 2:16 PM   Subscribe

      Scarlett Johansson continues problematic streak, will play a trans man [The Verge] ¡°A year after Scarlett Johansson¡¯s appearance in 2017¡¯s adaptation of Ghost in the Shell, in which she played a canonically Asian woman and sparked a conversation about whitewashing in Hollywood, the actor has made yet another questionable decision: next year, she¡¯ll be starring in Ghost director Rupert Sanders¡¯ Rub & Tug, a biopic based on the real-life story of massage parlor boss Dante ¡°Tex¡± Gill.¡±

      ? Johansson¡¯s response [Bustle]
      ¡°Tell them that they can be directed to Jeffrey Tambor, Jared Leto, and Felicity Huffman¡¯s reps for comment.¡±
      ? Trans Actors Protesting Scarlett Johansson's Trans Role Are Told They're Jealous, Unskilled Whiners [The Muse]
      ¡°Trans actors are asking why, of all roles, she would choose what, for a trans man, would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Trace Lysette of Transparent tweeted a link to the Bustle story with the captions.¡±
      ¡°Oh word?? So you can continue to play us but we can¡¯t play y¡¯all? Hollywood is so fucked... I wouldn¡¯t be as upset if I was getting in the same rooms as Jennifer Lawrence and Scarlett for cis roles, but we know that¡¯s not the case. A mess. [...] And not only do you play us and steal our narrative and our opportunity but you pat yourselves on the back with trophies and accolades for mimicking what we have lived... so twisted. I¡¯m so done...¡±
      ? Johansson is teaming up with her Ghost in the Shell director for another problematic casting choice. [Vox]
      ¡°Tambor, Leto, and Huffman are all cisgender actors who have played transgender roles; Tambor in the Amazon original series Transparent, Leto in 2013¡¯s Dallas Buyers Club, and Huffman in 2005¡¯s Transamerica. In other words, Johansson¡¯s answer is more of an excuse: ¡°If everyone else is doing it, I can do it, too.¡± This would be flawed thinking even without the added knowledge that each example she¡¯s cited is a performance that was critically acclaimed, suggesting that the idea of playing a transgender character as awards bait factored into the casting decision. (Tambor won a Golden Globe and two Emmys for his performance as Maura Pfefferman; Leto won an Oscar, a Golden Globe, and a SAG Award; and Huffman won a Golden Globe.) ¡±
      ? Scarlett Johansson can¡¯t do this: ¡°Pose¡± shows why authenticity matters in LGBT stories [Salon]
      ¡°But ¡°Pose¡± sets its target on greater sights than merely entertaining with sparkling visions of queer artists on a quest to capture "realness," always pursuing some approximation of the genuine article, some sacrificing their bodies to achieve it. What each episode does naturally, and beautifully, is take us into the stories of marginalized people with plots pegged to their lives and identities, making these stories central as opposed to auxiliary. It¡¯s not giving anything away to say this week¡¯s episode, like many before it, brings viewers nose to nose with the despair of the AIDS crisis in a way that makes the past present. As much as people would like to believe that HIV is under control, it¡¯s not. Few Americans care that it¡¯s still ravaging Third World countries. But it¡¯s also hitting crisis levels in Florida. That said, ¡°Pose¡± doesn¡¯t lash itself to one distinct message or issue, choosing instead (and wisely) to connect us to how the people living with these issues cope with them or fall short.¡±
      ? Why Scarlett Johansson Shouldn¡¯t Play a Trans Man [The New York Times]
      ¡°Jared Leto and Eddie Redmayne were lauded for their courage in portraying trans women on film (¡°Dallas Buyers Club¡± and ¡°The Danish Girl¡±) ¡ª but not so much by transgender women themselves, many of whom found the performances mannered, studied and implausible. If you haven¡¯t walked in our shoes, you wouldn¡¯t notice the difference. But we have, and we do. Trans actors should play trans roles because we can do the best job. The freedom to live our lives out loud ought to include the chance to make art from the complex, difficult, joyful reality of our lives. When Hollywood tells us that they love us, that we belong to them, we need to resist.¡±
      ? Sorry, Scarlett Johansson, but there's a difference between playing a role and playing an identity [Independent]
      ¡°Just a few years ago, Buffalo Bill was pretty much the only ¡°transgender¡± point of reference for straight, cisgender people. Literally the only representation of an entire community of already misunderstood people was a twisted serial killer. In a society already hostile to people living outside the ascribed confines of gender, and regardless of what was intended, this character acted to further marginalise us and make us seem like freakish and terrifying ¡°others¡±. Put simply, characters like this increase stigma, and therefore violence. Fast-forward to the present day and it¡¯s a positive relief that transgender people are represented on screen, page and stage in a much more varied and generally kinder way. But I can¡¯t pretend I¡¯m not disappointed that every time we¡¯re given space in mainstream cinema, it¡¯s through a cisgender actor.¡±
      posted by Fizz (130 comments total) 23 users marked this as a favorite
       
      Why? For a shot at an Oscar? I can't imagine Johansson doesn't have her pick of many other roles. And if she wins an Oscar for this won't it be, I don't know, tainted? Like winning a game by cheating? I hope this choice does lasting damage to her "brand" such as it is, but this is America so probably not.
      posted by axiom at 2:33 PM on July 8, 2018 [2 favorites]


      The transgender label appears to be one that is by no means certain, per this 2014 article.
      posted by gsh at 2:43 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      q: what¡¯s the difference between ScarJo and the Kola Superdeep Borehole project?
      a: one of them has stopped digging
      posted by murphy slaw at 2:46 PM on July 8, 2018 [30 favorites]


      Motoko was removed from her dying mother's womb and given a prosthetic body! Like I needed more reasons not to watch this movie.
      posted by Brocktoon at 2:52 PM on July 8, 2018


      She and Jared Leto have more than the controversy over this role in common!
      posted by Borborygmus at 2:54 PM on July 8, 2018


      Hey, she takes the role she deals with the blowback. That's how choice WORKS.
      posted by taterpie at 2:57 PM on July 8, 2018 [13 favorites]


      I blame the director/producers who cast her more than her for taking the role, but yea, it was definitely her choice, and dealing with the flack for that choice is part of her decision. She has more than enough money to never work again, she's not hard up for acting roles, and she can't have been unaware of the controversy this role would stir up.
      posted by ethical_caligula at 3:12 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      the actors bear some responsibility for this situation, but it's the rest of the system that is choosing and enabling them for these roles - the decisions are ultimately up to the people making the movies, not the actors - and that needs to be looked at, too
      posted by pyramid termite at 3:13 PM on July 8, 2018 [1 favorite]


      The Verge: That execs not only cast Johansson in this role...

      Johansson is one of the producers on this film.
      posted by Iris Gambol at 3:14 PM on July 8, 2018 [13 favorites]


      @Party_Harderson I do not think Scarlett Johansson is an evil person or has ill-intent, but I do feel that if she doesn¡¯t start hiring some career consultants moving forward we are 100% going to see her play Nelson Mandela in a biopic.
      posted by figurant at 3:14 PM on July 8, 2018 [80 favorites]


      We've usually limited casting of women as men and vice versa to comedy and very specific theater roles (ex: Peter Pan), though. It's kind of disingenuous to pretend like this is a thing that cisgendered actors do all of the time, unless it's playing trans for Oscar bait films.
      posted by Selena777 at 3:15 PM on July 8, 2018 [1 favorite]


      And we want them to stop pretending to be transgender. I think it's a very reasonable request.
      posted by Brocktoon at 3:15 PM on July 8, 2018 [9 favorites]


      I blame the director/producers who cast her more than her for taking the role

      Johansson is one of the producers.
      posted by urbanwhaleshark at 3:16 PM on July 8, 2018 [5 favorites]


      +1000 to primalux. A cis girl played King Arthur in an elementary school production I was in, because she put herself up for the role and did the best in the audition, and it really set my expectations for the rest of my life unrealistically.
      posted by potrzebie at 3:20 PM on July 8, 2018 [10 favorites]


      I'm just amazed she's citing Jeffrey Tambor, of all people, as a behavioral example. After everything that's gone down with him this year. Even more tone-deaf than, well, the rest of this tone-deaf behavior.
      posted by Rush-That-Speaks at 3:23 PM on July 8, 2018 [26 favorites]


      Yes, ScarJo is a producer.

      Was she before she was cast? Is it any less disappointing if she awards herself a role than if Toys R Us execs give themselves bonuses?

      I think for me the biggest thing is, she's learned nothing from her last experience. She just doubles down. She lacks empathy, which seems like a real problem for this role.
      posted by taterpie at 3:23 PM on July 8, 2018 [6 favorites]


      Mod note: Deleted a bunch of comments. The bullying thing is a gross derail at best, and there's no point in litigating it even a little.
      posted by restless_nomad (staff) at 3:38 PM on July 8, 2018 [13 favorites]


      Oh, geeze. It¡¯s true Motoko Kusanagi was a brain in a cybernetic body, but the film didn¡¯t do anything with that. Not a hint of dismorphicidentity, even though that was a super-easy theme to present. I really like Kasper Juul, but Ghost in the Shell was a terrible movie.
      posted by GenjiandProust at 3:42 PM on July 8, 2018 [2 favorites]


      ScarJo has the worst PR people in Hollywood. She compares herself to Jeffrey Tambor like gurl is that who you want people to think of when they think of your problematic ass?
      posted by supercrayon at 3:46 PM on July 8, 2018 [33 favorites]


      I¡¯m a trans person and I am pissed off about this.
      posted by nikaspark at 3:49 PM on July 8, 2018 [44 favorites]


      american historical films be like
      posted by Rhaomi at 3:50 PM on July 8, 2018 [10 favorites]


      I posted a comment that got deleted and it seems we must protect the feelings of people being called out for being tone deaf and arrogant about their shitty choices. Is anyone surprised that she's taking on another role that she has no business taking? We tolerate it as a society, even here.
      posted by driedmango at 3:52 PM on July 8, 2018 [5 favorites]


      "bankable actors draw attention to the experiences of marginalized people" seemed to be the justification that let this kind of thing slide for decades, but I guess we're done with that now that there's a female actor doing it
      posted by prize bull octorok at 3:52 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      It's also just a strange response, when people explain that something is problematic partly because it happens all the time, to respond with "I refer you to a bunch of other times this has happened." Surely the answer to "See Jeffrey Tambor et al" is "yes, exactly!"
      posted by trig at 3:52 PM on July 8, 2018 [13 favorites]


      Ghost in the shell was a terrible, terrible motion picture. I¡¯m surprised they¡¯re putting up money for this director again.
      posted by valkane at 4:01 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      Sure, the pushback against women is always worse. But that is because (straight white cis) men are allowed to get away with stuff that is wrong, not because this casting is ok.
      posted by jeather at 4:02 PM on July 8, 2018 [18 favorites]


      serious, non-loaded question: are movies like Philadelphia and Boys Don't Cry considered retroactively problematic now?
      posted by prize bull octorok at 4:04 PM on July 8, 2018 [8 favorites]


      but I guess we're done with that now that there's a female actor doing it

      Or maybe you didn't notice the similar outrage with Tambor and Leto, and all the cases before that where it was a man playing a trans woman? Because this is not a new reaction.
      posted by Dysk at 4:05 PM on July 8, 2018 [20 favorites]


      Sure, the pushback against women is always worse.

      I don't think we should just shrug that off.

      Or maybe you didn't notice the similar outrage with Tambor and Leto

      that is correct, I did not. the ScarJo pushback seems to be a lot more visible.
      posted by prize bull octorok at 4:13 PM on July 8, 2018 [2 favorites]


      serious, non-loaded question: are movies like Philadelphia and Boys Don't Cry considered retroactively problematic now?

      I try very hard not to judge history by modern standards. We can¡¯t even get this stuff right now, so blaming people 30 years ago for not doing it better seems unhelpful.

      I have never read one thing ScarJo has ever said that I thought seemed like a down-to-earth, I have base levels of humanity kind of comment. And she either can¡¯t learn or doesn¡¯t care to. I¡¯m unsurprised by this news.
      posted by greermahoney at 4:18 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      I have burning curiosity as to whether or not they put ScarJo in a fat suit.
      posted by muddgirl at 4:20 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      that is correct, I did not. the ScarJo pushback seems to be a lot more visible.

      Her choosing another project that is this fraught/controversial right after Ghost in the Shell is part of why the criticism is so visible/apparent.
      posted by Fizz at 4:23 PM on July 8, 2018 [21 favorites]


      I'm just amazed she's citing Jeffrey Tambor, of all people, as a behavioral example. After everything that's gone down with him this year. Even more tone-deaf than, well, the rest of this tone-deaf behavior.

      Right? Imagine going through life thinking "Anything that Jeffrey Tambor or Jared Leto did is a fine idea for me to do too."
      posted by IAmUnaware at 4:28 PM on July 8, 2018 [9 favorites]


      Why do these unknown actors think people would pay to see them in a movie rather than Scarlett Johansson?

      Or are Johansson and her co-producers expected to risk losing their investment so an unknown can take the lead role? Millions of dollars are at stake. You don't get to tell people what to do with their own money.
      posted by Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez at 4:31 PM on July 8, 2018 [2 favorites]


      Sometimes people go to the movies to see a story instead of a name. That's way more often the case these days.
      posted by Selena777 at 4:33 PM on July 8, 2018 [22 favorites]


      I made a post about Eddie Redmayne's casting in The Danish Girl back in 2015. This comment by nebulawindphone is worth re-reading. It is very much relevant to this conversation we're still having in 2018.
      posted by Fizz at 4:35 PM on July 8, 2018 [23 favorites]


      Why do these unknown actors think people would pay to see them in a movie rather than Scarlett Johansson?

      If Hollywood would cast more disenfranchised voices/people then they wouldn't be so unknown. Visibility, opportunity, and agency. These are things that are not too often given to people who are on the margins of society.
      posted by Fizz at 4:38 PM on July 8, 2018 [94 favorites]


      You don't get to tell people what to do with their own money.

      who is gonna stop me
      posted by poffin boffin at 4:38 PM on July 8, 2018 [79 favorites]


      You don't get to tell people what to do with their own money.

      Of course we do. They're hoping to sell us something. One possible and proportionate response is 'no, this is bad and we will not show up, here's why,' and a good marketer would be interested in that.

      Upon preview, I regret that I only have one favorite to give Fizz for this:

      If Hollywood would cast more disenfranchised voices/people then they wouldn't be so unknown.

      A-fucking-men.
      posted by mordax at 4:39 PM on July 8, 2018 [56 favorites]


      that is correct, I did not. the ScarJo pushback seems to be a lot more visible.

      It was there regardless. That you and others have only just started paying attention does not change facts.
      posted by Dysk at 4:42 PM on July 8, 2018 [32 favorites]


      Why do these unknown actors think people would pay to see them in a movie rather than Scarlett Johansson?
      Try listening more.
      posted by chococat at 4:43 PM on July 8, 2018 [23 favorites]


      serious, non-loaded question: are movies like Philadelphia and Boys Don't Cry considered retroactively problematic now?

      I mean, it's not even "retroactively" for Boys Don't Cry ¡ª some trans people were upset about it even at the time. They just didn't have as big a platform to get their complaints heard.

      I haven't watched it since it came out, and as a trans woman I'm not the one whose opinion about it matters, but FWIW I've got mixed feelings about it. I think in some ways it was progress. I also think in some ways it wasn't.
      posted by nebulawindphone at 4:47 PM on July 8, 2018 [25 favorites]


      Why do these unknown actors think people would pay to see them in a movie rather than Scarlett Johansson?

      Or are Johansson and her co-producers expected to risk losing their investment so an unknown can take the lead role? Millions of dollars are at stake. You don't get to tell people what to do with their own money.


      There are a ton of ways to make this work. And they absolutely have power in how to do this. If it's a story she really wants to tell she could choose who to have involved and doesn't need to be in the main role. It sounds way out there I guess but this is a perfect opportunity for her to make an impact by stepping slightly over to the side. There are so many talented people out there. She'd be reaching more people that way too instead of alienating everyone.
      posted by mokeydraws at 4:57 PM on July 8, 2018 [9 favorites]


      If they need the draw of Scarlett Johannson she could play Tex Gill's wife, Cynthia Bruno.
      posted by muddgirl at 5:05 PM on July 8, 2018 [19 favorites]


      You don't get to tell people what to do with their own money.

      I don't actually see anyone doing that. Saying "a bunch of the people most likely to otherwise be interested in this film find your casting choices problematic and we might not spend our money on it" isn't telling anyone what to do with their money.

      Likewise, no one is telling Ms. Johansson she can't play the role, but rather, that her doing so troubles them because they'd like to start seeing trans actors on screen more, and so why not at least start with giving trans actors the opportunity to tell their own stories?

      That reaponse is compounded by another, similar unfortunate choice by Johansson, and the fact that she's poised to repeat that mistake is troubling for a different set of reasons, but none of them have to do with what anyone believes she can or can't do.

      I think Johansson probably did not ask herself, honestly, "am I the best person to tell this story?" which, yes, is not a question we have always wanted our storytellers and artists to ask, but it is increasingly becoming so, and it's a bummer than Johansson's repsonse to that desire is defensiveness, rather than openness and empathy. That she seems to lack empathy for the very community of whom the character she intends to portray was a part makes the decision all the more troubling - she might not handle the storytelling well at all, any good work done by getting the story told might be undermined by the method of its telling.

      Perhaps instead of framing it: you can't tell the filmmakers what they can do with their own money, we should frame it: the filmmakers can't tell trans people what can be done with their own story.
      posted by eustacescrubb at 5:08 PM on July 8, 2018 [12 favorites]


      Also, as you can see from his obituary in the Post Gazette (trigger warning for misgendering language), Gill insisted that he was a man.
      posted by muddgirl at 5:09 PM on July 8, 2018 [7 favorites]


      As we've established that she doesn't need the money or the exposure, I'll suggest that she wants to do it because she wants to play a trans man in a movie. You may disagree with her desire to do so, but she's in a place in her career, thanks to Avengers money/fame, etc., where she can call the shots and pick the parts for herself.

      It should go without saying that she has every right to claim the role and make the movie if she wants to, and a less-ungenerous view of it is that she finds the challenge of playing this character appealing.

      As was pointed out, film-making is a business, and a marquee name helps the film get made. If she doesn't get cast, then the story doesn't get told. It may also be that she wants to parlay her box office strength specifically to tell stories that wouldn't otherwise be told.

      Now, you might ask, what about A Fantastic Woman? And I'd reply, great movie--I had the pleasure of attending a screening where Daniela Vega and director Sebasti¨¢n Lelio had a Q&A afterwards. Its box office totalled $3M. That's a rounding error for an MCU flick.

      So, if ScarJo makes this movie, and it grosses, say, $30M (by comparison, for example, Phantom Thread grossed $46M worldwide), that's how many people get exposed to the theme, the story, the character. You may think the story shouldn't be told except as played by a transgender thespian, but the perfect is the enemy of the good, and some might think it better to get people who would never pay to see a trans-themed film into the theater on the basis of the lead's name/fame.

      Then, is it better for the film never to be made--or, if made, to be relegated to art house obscurity--than to have it made with her in the lead?
      posted by the sobsister at 5:09 PM on July 8, 2018 [15 favorites]


      that is correct, I did not. the ScarJo pushback seems to be a lot more visible

      Misogyny poisons all critical discussions about women, because you're never going to be sure that the criticism isn't rooted in misogyny. It's a really uncomfortable fact. I deal with all of the time. But we can't let that suspicion result in us giving women a pass when they really fuck up like this.

      In this case, a lot of the criticism of Johansson is coming from people who are directly affected (trans actors). It's not being co-opted to score points against women, as is the case when alt-right youtubers rant about "white feminism." Surely, trans actors being heard is a good thing? And for the most part, the criticism is coming from people who are usually sensitive to the double standards that women face - trans writers, feminists, and so on.

      Johansson is a really big actor right now. What she does makes more news, and on top of it, the fact that this is the second time adds a kind of viral quality to it. I'd expect this to be a bigger story than the criticism of Tambor's role in Transparent even if she was a cis man being hired to play a trans woman.

      We can't throw trans people under the bus to protect women, especially when there's very little concrete to go on to indicate that the criticism is actually disproportionate or that it's being used disingenuously.
      posted by Kutsuwamushi at 5:10 PM on July 8, 2018 [41 favorites]


      Then, is it better for the film never to be made--or, if made, to be relegated to art house obscurity--than to have it made with her in the lead?

      the sobsister, you raise some very good points. I appreciate that you're joining in with this conversation. I don't know that I have an answer for this question outside of the fact that, if you make enough of a marginal thing, at some point it stops being marginal and it starts to be mainstream. I mean, at one point in film history, comic book films were sort of on the outskirts, they were considered childish and not given a lot of seriousness, but now look at that genre.

      I get that she has a lot of star power and that this brings something to the table, it makes other producers, writers, the entire industry pay attention. But, as was mentioned above, she could have just as easily brought her star power to this film and used it to champion someone else, to tell their story and to lift them up.
      posted by Fizz at 5:15 PM on July 8, 2018 [7 favorites]


      Maybe at some point trans actors will be hired so often to play cis characters that this won't matter, but right now trans actors are mostly restricted to playing trans characters (please feel free to inform me of examples against it -- my google searches kept coming back to this story). So there are not many roles trans actors have any chance at (which is also a problem), and even those get taken by cis actors.
      posted by jeather at 5:24 PM on July 8, 2018 [14 favorites]


      But, as was mentioned above, she could have just as easily brought her star power to this film and used it to champion someone else, to tell their story and to lift them up.

      Fizz, that's true. But having her as a producer on a film is much less likely to get asses in seats. Compare ScarJo producing and trans actor X starring to ScarJo onscreen. Which is going to open bigger? Which is going to get more buzz? Which is going to bring the topic to the mass media outlets from which much of America gets its entertainment news?
      posted by the sobsister at 5:27 PM on July 8, 2018 [1 favorite]


      Then, is it better for the film never to be made--or, if made, to be relegated to art house obscurity--than to have it made with her in the lead?

      The thing that always informs my opinion on this is: what if it were my life or story? How would I feel about it?

      On that basis, I definitely don't think it's better with Scarlet Johansson in the lead.
      posted by Dysk at 5:29 PM on July 8, 2018 [18 favorites]


      Fizz, that's true. But being a producer on a film is much less likely to get asses in seats. Compare ScarJo producing and trans actor X starring to ScarJo onscreen. Which is going to open bigger?

      Maybe try reading what other people have said.
      posted by juv3nal at 5:30 PM on July 8, 2018 [5 favorites]


      At the barest fucking minimum, cis people playing trans roles reinforces the idea that trans people are just making it up and that shit is harming us so profoundly that I would appreciate cis actors giving up their fascination with playing our roles and instead do something like give umpteen million dollars to Equality Texas instead of making another movie that reinforces these harmful notions.
      posted by nikaspark at 5:30 PM on July 8, 2018 [53 favorites]


      But being a producer on a film is much less likely to get asses in seats.

      I need asses in seats shutting down the Capitol building in the state of Texas in the spring of 2019 when the Texas GOP stands an excellent chance of passing a round of anti-lgbt legislation that will make North Carolina look like a social democracy in comparison. I don¡¯t need asses in the seats of movie theaters watching a cis person portray a trans man.
      posted by nikaspark at 5:35 PM on July 8, 2018 [58 favorites]


      It's about exploiting a trans man in order to get $$$$ and an Oscar.

      This is entirely presumptive. Even wildly successful, this film will likely not break $40M worldwide gross. That's nothing for her movies.

      And do people take on roles for the likelihood of getting an Oscar, given how tortuous and unpredictable a path that can take?

      Bear in mind that she takes on this role with the keen knowledge of the backlash to Ghost in the Shell. So, she's either clueless as to the impact--not something I think is likely for one of Hollywood's biggest stars--or she's decided to take her lumps and stick with whatever reasons she has for making this film.
      posted by the sobsister at 5:35 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      Yeah, the issue for me is less "cis person playing trans role" as it is "cis woman playing trans male role (because trans men are basically women)". Cast a cis woman to play a trans woman, or a cis man to play a trans man, and I have much less of an issue.
      posted by Dysk at 5:35 PM on July 8, 2018 [34 favorites]


      the sobsister: And do people take on roles for the likelihood of getting an Oscar, given how tortuous and unpredictable a path that can take?

      Yes. I mean, I don't know what else to say to this question except yes. I don't know how you can be even marginally aware of Hollywood and not know that the answer to that question is "yes."
      posted by tzikeh at 5:42 PM on July 8, 2018 [31 favorites]


      Mod note: the sobsister, now is the time to back off, because you're centering the conversation on yourself here.
      posted by restless_nomad (staff) at 5:43 PM on July 8, 2018 [13 favorites]


      And I¡¯m gonna go off on a wee tangent here and state cis actors have shown that they do not posses the range to acurately portray and capture and reflect back the lives of trans people.

      It¡¯s like someone still wearing clothes their mom picked out for them and exclaiming ¡°you¡¯re a fashion icon!¡±

      I have yet to see a cis actor play a trans role that wasn¡¯t embarrassing as fuck to watch. It¡¯s like an own goal on your acting career. Why do it.
      posted by nikaspark at 5:49 PM on July 8, 2018 [15 favorites]


      You may think the story shouldn't be told except as played by a transgender thespian

      Hmmm I¡¯m more worried about what kind of story gets told when it¡¯s not being told by a trans man. Somehow I don¡¯t think the aspects of Gill¡¯s story that Gill or a modern trans man would find compelling will be the same aspects of the story that cis people find compelling. Who tells the story determines what story gets told.

      If they¡¯re not even interested in what trans men and the queer community of the time have to say about this...it¡¯s gonna be an exploitive story.

      She wants an Oscar. She¡¯s not gonna get it now.
      posted by schadenfrau at 5:52 PM on July 8, 2018 [14 favorites]


      ...do people take on roles for the likelihood of getting an Oscar, given how tortuous and unpredictable a path that can take?

      Yes, campaigning is a career investment, though the initial pay bump post-win is much less for women than it is for men. (Though Johansson's certainly not hurting now, having "Oscar-winner" in front of her name may help her down the line, as she ages and is considered less bankable.)
      posted by Iris Gambol at 5:53 PM on July 8, 2018 [2 favorites]


      Yes, I did, thanks. ScarJo herself in the role is the draw. Not ScarJo as the lead character's wife or boss or neighbor.

      I don't understand this response at all. Famous actors are cast in supporting roles to less famous actors all the damn time. The alchemy of what draws people to films and what is going to turn them off is far more complex than "famous person is/is not in lead role".
      posted by oneirodynia at 5:54 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      Yeah, the issue for me is less "cis person playing trans role" as it is "cis woman playing trans male role (because trans men are basically women)". Cast a cis woman to play a trans woman, or a cis man to play a trans man, and I have much less of an issue.

      Thanks for this clarification, I was actually just wondering about this.
      posted by corb at 6:12 PM on July 8, 2018 [5 favorites]


      Mod note: There is absolutely nothing to be gained by bringing in the question of blackface here - it's a complete derail. Please pick another argument.
      posted by restless_nomad (staff) at 6:36 PM on July 8, 2018 [8 favorites]


      For reference, here's the Mefi thread about Transparent. There's definitely a lengthly debate about a cis man playing the role, but it feels less hostile to Tambor.

      IMHO, I think Johansson is getting more push back than the cis men mentioned above and I think the reason is misogyny. Nothing is more natural in our society than telling a woman she's wrong (regardless if she is or not.)
      posted by gwint at 6:55 PM on July 8, 2018 [5 favorites]


      That thread was 4 years ago. Many MANY metas have happened since then clarifying trans issues on this site. It's apples and oranges to compare these two threads.
      posted by Homo neanderthalensis at 7:06 PM on July 8, 2018 [28 favorites]


      I think you¡¯re cherry picking to make a point that¡¯s reading a little weird to me, the Danish girl and Dallas buyers club was met with massive hostilities in the queer communities I run with, and transparent has met a large amount of rightfully deserved heated criticism over the years. I feel you¡¯re dragging something into the conversation as a way of trying to quell criticism, I¡¯m having a hard time with that.

      That said, sure we need to remain intersectional as fuck and keep misogyny in our frame, I just think using transparent and the representation of trans women as your source citation is kind making it feel like trans women aren¡¯t actual women and your comment is defaulting to cis women only.
      posted by nikaspark at 7:06 PM on July 8, 2018 [26 favorites]


      Regarding Boys Don't Cry, the journalist who broke the story wrote recently and very interestingly about how her own ignorance, biases, and bigotry led her to reporting Brandon Teena's story in a way that she now regrets:
      Boys Don¡¯t Cry director Kimberly Peirce told me in a recent interview that my article had been the major inspiration for her film about Brandon¡¯s life and murder: ¡°Your article was on fire. I read it and I fell in love with Brandon. It made me love his vulnerability, his daring, his innocence, the way that he gave pleasure sexually. I was in love with this person who had shaped himself.¡±

      It also proved to be the most insensitive and inaccurate piece of journalism I have ever written.

      For years, I have wanted to apologize for what I now understand, with some shame, was the article¡¯s implicit anti-trans framing.
      It's a really fascinating reassessment of her piece, what she got right and wrong, and how her own biases, preconceptions, misunderstandings, personal experiences, and bigotry got in the way of her reporting; I urge you all to spend 20 minutes reading it.
      posted by Eyebrows McGee at 7:09 PM on July 8, 2018 [56 favorites]


      Also seconding nikaspark- just because 4 years ago on metafilter there wasn¡¯t a ton of pushback against Tambor doesn¡¯t mean there wasn¡¯t a ton of pushback in queer circles. Cause there was. A ton.
      posted by Homo neanderthalensis at 7:14 PM on July 8, 2018 [22 favorites]


      IMHO, I think Johansson is getting more push back than the cis men mentioned above and I think the reason is misogyny. Nothing is more natural in our society than telling a woman she's wrong (regardless if she is or not.)

      I think it's because of misogyny - why would the world take the complaints of trans women seriously? Nothing is more natural than pretending things aren't as big a problem when it's trans women on the line.
      posted by Dysk at 8:29 PM on July 8, 2018 [19 favorites]


      Nthing the notion that the pushback here is not new. I am a cis-male, so take that as you will, but I saw plenty of pushback towards Leto and Tambor¡¯s choices in taking the roles that they did from people I know and love who have a personal stake in being represented in media by actors who share their gender identity rather than being ¡°portrayed¡± by cis-gender people.
      posted by invitapriore at 8:30 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      (i.e. as far as any mismatch in treatment does exist, it's hardly Scarlet Johansson who is being shat on excessively. Rather, it is people like Tambor and Leto being shat on insufficiently, because trans women's concerns are still often not taken seriously)
      posted by Dysk at 8:34 PM on July 8, 2018 [15 favorites]


      It's also visibility. Leto's known for My So-Called Life, and Requiem for a Dream, plus a long career of forgettable roles. His Joker came after Dallas Buyer's Club.

      Tambor is known (these days) for Arrested Development, primarily.

      Johansson is at least an order of magnitude more famous than either of these guys. That alone would lead her to draw more criticism. That she just fucked up in the same manner with Ghost in the Shell last year is really what's driving this, though.
      posted by explosion at 8:42 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      I just want to say I don't feel qualified to offer an opinion, but I am listening.
      posted by SecretAgentSockpuppet at 8:56 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      "the ScarJo pushback seems to be a lot more visible."

      That's true, but that's mostly because progressives don't give a shit when transfeminine people complain that we're being treated like garbage. Trans women were furious about Tambor, and the fact that he continued to get work despite his terrible behaviour. Most cis people didn't listen to us. In contrast, every trans man I know was super supportive. It's spectacularly disingenuous to use the fact that you all didn't listen to trans women then as an excuse to not listen to trans men now.

      To me, Johansson's comments just read like the "white cis lady tears" thing, and I'm pretty tired of it. She's the one who has done wrong here, and she's trying to deflect the blame onto other people. Fuck that: the vast majority of cis women are perfectly capable of not being gross to transgender people, so this trans lady is going to reserve her sympathy for them.
      posted by saltbush and olive at 9:20 PM on July 8, 2018 [33 favorites]


      Her response was super tone deaf and erased all sympathy I had for her position.
      posted by Dip Flash at 9:27 PM on July 8, 2018 [4 favorites]


      @mbirdwether: In Antarctica there are some 80 plus holes such as the one pictured below, used by scientists to study neutrinos. Created using heated pipes, they are some 1.5 miles deep, a depth exceeded in man-made drilling only by the hole Scarlett Johansson is digging at this moment.

      (Tweet includes pic of the neutrino hole, which is pretty cool).
      posted by ActionPopulated at 9:53 PM on July 8, 2018 [8 favorites]


      I saw press about Tambor and Leto¡¯s projects, and the focus was squarely on how great it was that they wanted to challenge themselves by stepping outside of the typical roles that were coming their way, challenge others whose worldviews may not yet include trans people living their lives, and gain greater empathy by walking a mile in someone else¡¯s shoes. All consciousness-expanding stuff. Like, doing this will help open the door for more similar projects in future, which could then be acted in by people who are a more natural fit.

      But the coverage here and last time around is zero-sum. Like, by her taking on this role, she¡¯s taking something away from others.

      There is truth to both sides of the coin. It¡¯s interesting what gets focused on. I wonder what it is that makes the difference. Maybe the side that¡¯s weighted more heavily is shifting as time goes on? (we now have Caitlyn Jenner, Chelsea Manning, etc in mainstream consciousness) Maybe we just don¡¯t believe she¡¯ll be able to do a good job of it?
      posted by mantecol at 10:06 PM on July 8, 2018 [1 favorite]


      In addition to all of the other reasons mentioned above, I think the push-back against Johannson is a little stronger than that against Leto or Tambor because of the recent "Ghost in the Shell" situation. Her acceptance of this role suggests that she learned nothing.
      posted by Joey Michaels at 10:10 PM on July 8, 2018 [1 favorite]


      mantecol: "I saw press about Tambor and Leto¡¯s projects, and the focus was squarely on how great it was that they wanted to challenge themselves by stepping outside of the typical roles that were coming their way, challenge others whose worldviews may not yet include trans people living their lives, and gain greater empathy by walking a mile in someone else¡¯s shoes. All consciousness-expanding stuff. Like, doing this will help open the door for more similar projects in future, which could then be acted in by people who are a more natural fit. But the coverage here and last time around is zero-sum. Like, by her taking on this role, she¡¯s taking something away from others. There is truth to both sides of the coin. "

      I'm going to step away from this thread because I'm starting to get angry, but ... please, please don't do this. If the coverage you read of Tambor and Leto appeared that way to you, I can pretty much guarantee it's because you weren't reading anything written by trans women. We didn't want cis men in those roles. We argued strongly at that time that they were taking roles from trans women. We yelled it at the top of our lungs. Nobody listened. It was wrong then, and it's still wrong now. There really aren't two sides to this.
      posted by saltbush and olive at 10:17 PM on July 8, 2018 [75 favorites]


      serious, non-loaded question: are movies like Philadelphia and Boys Don't Cry considered retroactively problematic now?

      I mean... yes, of course it was also a problem that, in the early 1990s, an HIV-positive gay man would never have been cast to play an HIV-positive gay man in a movie about being an HIV-positive gay man in the early 1990s, at exactly the point when it was such a huge deal for the people who were living that, and those of us who were adjacent to that. (It came out at roughly the same point in my childhood where I was being told I had to lie about or not talk about an HIV-related death in the family because anything else would be Shameful. Yes, my family would have been helped by seeing that representation.)

      Are movies containing racism or racist casting "retroactively problematic" just because we notice this stuff more now? If there wasn't a general pervasive awareness of the problem such that I personally think that the actor involved knew there was an issue, I'm not as inclined to see it as much of an issue of personal responsibility--not "not at all", but less so. Now, especially for this particular actor? She knows, and she's doing it anyway. If twenty years from now people actually consider this to be a culturally influential movie on the scale of Philadelphia, I'll see it then, but I'm not really expecting that to happen.
      posted by Sequence at 10:27 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      If you want yet another reason why the reaction to Rub & Tug might seem stronger than the one to, say, Transparent - in addition to "you missed it" and "Johannson just came off of playing a japanese woman in Ghost in the Shell with the same director" and "she isn't just cast in it, she's a producer on the movie" and "her response to criticism was to cite three cis actors who won awards for playing trans parts, two of whom have disavowed their casting and one of whom is a sexual predator" - perhaps consider the framing of the work itself? Transparent was very explicitly both fiction, and about Tambor's character being a trans woman. However, Rub & Tug is a biopic about an actual person, and - according to the trades and the messaging from the studio - is:

      an American Hustle-like true story in which Rupert Sanders will direct Scarlett Johansson in the fact-based story of a woman who flourished in a male-dominated business of massage parlors and prostitution by essentially taking on the physical identity of a man. ... Jean Marie Gill was a larger-than-life character who took on the mob and became the crime kingpin of 1970s Pittsburgh through her empire of illicit massage parlors and an anabolic steroids ring that helped fuel the Pittsburgh Steelers¡¯ NFL dynasty, all the while cross-dressing and leaning on her allies in the gay community to help grow her empire. However, it is Jean¡¯s fiery romance with her girlfriend Cynthia that truly defines her and forms the emotional core of the story.

      Which is slightly different. It's not just erasure in casting, it's violent erasure in writing too. Almost as though the cis woman who cast herself to play a trans man is doing an especially disrespectful portrayal!
      posted by kafziel at 10:53 PM on July 8, 2018 [39 favorites]


      I didn't mean they aren't a problem, I meant that it's not some kind of retroactive "only in the light of the current culture this is bad" thing, they were ALWAYS racist, they didn't suddenly become racist because we started thinking about it.
      posted by Sequence at 10:55 PM on July 8, 2018 [3 favorites]


      Which is slightly different. It's not just erasure in casting, it's violent erasure in writing too. Almost as though the cis woman who cast herself to play a trans man is doing an especially disrespectful portrayal!

      holy crap, they're deadnaming the subject of their biopic in their press package?
      posted by murphy slaw at 11:39 PM on July 8, 2018 [23 favorites]


      Deadnaming is something you do to someone trans. According to them, Gill wasn't trans. Dante was a pseudonym.
      posted by kafziel at 11:54 PM on July 8, 2018


      AFAICT, Gill was a trans man who was aggressively misgendered by the press, who treated his trans status as a laugh line. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette misgendered him in their 2003 obituary, all the while noting
      In all the old newspaper stories about Dante "Tex" Gill, she was always "the woman who prefers to be known as a man," or some variation of that description, and she sure looked and acted the part.

      Short and dumpy, she wore men's suits and short hair, she talked tough and she may even have undergone the initial stages of a sex change that made her appear masculine.

      For years, according to police, Ms. Gill ran a string of parlors as fronts for prostitution, all the while insisting that she was a man and telling everyone she wanted to be known as "Mr. Gill."
      (emphasis mine)
      posted by murphy slaw at 12:08 AM on July 9, 2018 [26 favorites]


      Yeah, sarcasm might not have come through in text. Dante Gill was inarguably a trans man. But to the people making the movie, and thus presumably in the movie, he wasn't and won't be.
      posted by kafziel at 12:27 AM on July 9, 2018 [7 favorites]


      I don't understand this casting at all. Do all these people who would only go see a movie if scarlet johanson is the lead (seriously argued here) actually want to see her play a man? How does it make sense to have her play someone 'short and dumpy' and masculine? It's just crazy to me on several levels, including 'why does hollywood hire incredibly attractive people to play someone who was unremarkable looking'. It's bad, insensitive, illogical, and ultimately hugely selfish casting that contributes to erasure. I think 'you should be grateful for what you get' is a terrible way to look at this.
      posted by stillnocturnal at 2:01 AM on July 9, 2018 [12 favorites]


      I think about how cis journalists such as Jesse Singal and cis doctors who treat trans people are giving a tell here for us. In their views us trans people aren¡¯t capable or trustworthy of telling our own stories ourselves, that the only way we are legitimate is if who we are passes through a cis person to judge and determine who we are as fact. We can¡¯t be a fact unto ourselves.

      In that way this is how movie makers and story writers treat us too. And it is patronizing. It is misogyny against trans men and transmisogyny against trans women.
      posted by nikaspark at 2:14 AM on July 9, 2018 [21 favorites]


      (And by perpetrating misogyny against trans men, it becomes a really shit, gaslighting way for cis people to violently misgender trans men)
      posted by nikaspark at 2:20 AM on July 9, 2018 [7 favorites]


      Sigh, I really like Scarlett Johansson, this makes me upset and sad. I didn't see Ghost in the Shell and I won't be seeing this either.

      But what I want to do now is obsessively read a bunch of articles about Dante ¡°Tex¡± Gill's life because I've never heard of him before and it sounds like a fascinating story. Google results are currently overrun with Johansson so if anyone has some links that are pre-Rub&Tug I'd appreciate it. Does Dante Gill go by another name? I can't find an article on Wikipedia which seems strange to me.
      posted by like_neon at 2:36 AM on July 9, 2018 [3 favorites]


      The real tragedy here is that they didn¡¯t cast Lea DeLaria as Gill.
      posted by tristeza at 2:41 AM on July 9, 2018 [5 favorites]


      Just going to leave this here. Such casting, very wow.
      posted by Dysk at 2:53 AM on July 9, 2018 [1 favorite]


      like_neon - to find more relevant results you can do a search using "-Johansson" (without quotes) or restricting dates
      sorry if you tried this already

      posted by trig at 2:53 AM on July 9, 2018


      Two trans writers on Boys Don¡¯t Cry
      posted by pxe2000 at 2:55 AM on July 9, 2018 [3 favorites]


      I remember reading the obituary when Gill died and thinking that his story would make a great movie. 1970's Pittsburgh was right in the middle of the steel crash and was really at its nadir; still dirty and ugly from a century of mills but with one of the worst employment rates in the country. Setting an organized crime story in that world with Tex Gill at the center could be awesome so I was excited when I heard about this film but then so disappointed when I found out how they were doing it.
      posted by octothorpe at 3:35 AM on July 9, 2018 [3 favorites]


      I¡¯ll probably go hate watch it and feel burning dysphoria because I¡¯ll never be cis. Just another day in the park being trans.
      posted by nikaspark at 4:25 AM on July 9, 2018 [2 favorites]


      Hillary Swank was hardly a household name when she made Boys Don't Cry. A small biopic or "serious issue" film doesn't need a star of Johansson's magnitude. They could have gone for a director who is a draw or cast a star in a supporting role. A smaller role in a Serious Movie is a thing actors do when they want to boost their acting cred.
      posted by Mavri at 5:52 AM on July 9, 2018 [2 favorites]


      Has everyone watched The T yet? So good! The acting, the writing, the beautiful interior cinematography...
      posted by latkes at 6:04 AM on July 9, 2018 [1 favorite]


      "Gain greater empathy by walking a mile in someone else¡¯s shoes," by using those shoes to stomp all over the people in question, who are saying this is not OK (SO MAYBE WE SHOULD LISTEN TO THEM)? No thank you.
      posted by sacchan at 6:26 AM on July 9, 2018 [1 favorite]


      Then, is it better for the film never to be made--or, if made, to be relegated to art house obscurity--than to have it made with her in the lead?

      For many of us, having cis straight people who don't know the first things about us re-interpret and tell our stories to a cis straight audience is essentially promoting misinformation in addition to erasing us. Their insistence on telling our stories without us means they get those stories wrong, reduces them to cis straight people talking to other cis straight people about us without including us. What good does that do us? Why are we supposed to be excited about yet another cis straight interpretation of queer and trans lives for a cis straight audience that refuses our participation and smooths us out to be palatable to cis straight people at every turn? Other people have said it better above, but the ways that this erases queer and trans people is actively harmful, and it becomes yet another piece of media where cis straight people can gawk at us without understanding or empathizing with us, while normalizing having a cis woman play a trans man.

      I guess I'm sticking with local theater.
      posted by bile and syntax at 6:48 AM on July 9, 2018 [39 favorites]


      Man, the press for this is just shit, shit, shit. I would be unhappy about Ms. Johansson or any cis woman playing a trans man, but the way the writeups perpetuate the 1970s transphobic denial of Gill's identity is just utterly horrendous. I feel like this would be less likely if Gill had been more conventionally handsome, rather than a short, fat, "dumpy" trans man? Like, if you're a trans person who succeeds in being a particularly fine specimen of your gender, your prize is that people agree to be nice to your face and deadname you less often. Ugh. How is basic respect so fucking difficult.
      posted by desuetude at 7:32 AM on July 9, 2018 [20 favorites]


      Excluding Marvel, I thought about the past movies I remember most clearly from Johannson, and they all share a thread that I haven¡¯t seen considered in the discussions around this Tex role.

      ¡°Her¡±: The character has no body, and eventually transcends humanity.
      ¡°Lucy¡±: The character exists in a body of arbitrary nature, and eventually transcends humanity.
      ¡°Under the Skin¡±: The character has a body, but discovers that it¡¯s alien to themself and others.
      ¡°Ghost in the Shell¡±: The character has a cyborg body, and falls in love with a character with no body.

      Whatever else is right or wrong here, there¡¯s a clear trend: Johannson seems to specialize in playing body-queer roles. If Johannson is ¡®in the closet¡¯ in one or another respect, given the outrage she absorbs for taking (and, now, producing!) queer roles, I wouldn¡¯t blame her for installing another lock on any closet doors she might have and staying in forever.
      posted by crysflame at 7:35 AM on July 9, 2018 [3 favorites]


      Here is an actor who has serious wealth and significant power in Hollywood. Her box office power is based on her looks and sexiness, and is likely to be time-limited. She's an actor, and actors don't need to be the person they portray; it's acting. Even if she weren't a producer of the film, I would be confident that she lobbied hard for the role. As it is, she is likely to be an investor and one assumes that gave her the casting choice. Would the film be made without her money and box office power? With all this publicity?

      At this moment in time, as issues for people who are trans are coming to the forefront, she could use her power to fill the role with an actor who is trans. She has been politically active and could use her power for trans rights, She isn't required to, but what an opportunity. If nothing else, a less facile answer is needed. Step up, Scarlet.
      posted by theora55 at 7:58 AM on July 9, 2018 [3 favorites]


      However "body queer" Johansson might be, it does not give her any right to recast people's gender, lives, or character to serve her exploration of such an identity (and it's pure speculation at this point that that is what is happening). Effectively misgendering Gill is what this film does. Reducing a trans person or trans identity to equivalent to that of an AI in scifi or anime is at best deeply respectful. Trans people are not cool analogies for cis people to play with. Stick with playing robots or whatever is that's what you're into.
      posted by Dysk at 7:58 AM on July 9, 2018 [27 favorites]


      It may be true that Johansson is drawn to characters that have atypical relationships to their bodies, and that may be because she feels some otherness in her relationship to her own body, trapped in a role she did not choose ¡ª and I will finally feel like I have something to talk to her about when we never meet, because so do I and I am not trans. But I also wouldn¡¯t feel entitled to telling a trans man¡¯s story as some sort of vehicle for exploring my own life or story. There are people who are living these stories now, today, and this should belong to them.

      So I don¡¯t really care if Johansson is queer. (That¡¯s a lie, I do care, just not in this context.) She¡¯s still being a selfish asshole on this one. She can be both at the same time.
      posted by schadenfrau at 8:55 AM on July 9, 2018 [24 favorites]


      Like, if you're a trans person who succeeds in being a particularly fine specimen of your gender

      If I listen only to what people tell me and don't listen to my near life-destroying dysphoria, I am a trans person who has apparently achieved this "goal". Based on my experiences it is a consolation prize that erases my actual gender experience by defaulting me into cis which in turn alienates me from trans communities and cis communities, affords me the privilege of not getting harassed or attacked in broad daylight by strangers, has made my career easier (that's a huge privilege and one I recognize dearly) and at the end of the day effectively renders me into a pretty looking ghost who traded one inauthentic life for another.

      So on the whole it's a win, I'll take it and make it awesome as that is how I do things, but it's not exactly the best life either.
      posted by nikaspark at 9:12 AM on July 9, 2018 [14 favorites]


      I will never stop being amazed at the lengths people will go to, here and everywhere else on the internet, to carefully and at great length explain why they are going to continue talking over trans people sharing their personal experiences and feelings about open and unashamedly transphobic media.
      posted by poffin boffin at 9:15 AM on July 9, 2018 [45 favorites]


      If Johannson is ¡®in the closet¡¯ in one or another respect, given the outrage she absorbs for taking (and, now, producing!) queer roles, I wouldn¡¯t blame her for installing another lock on any closet doors she might have and staying in forever.

      I identify as queer, and I'm really deeply, deeply uncomfortable with you identifying all of those roles as "queer" when all of these are characters that you've also identified as either not-human or becoming not-human. She is not acting in roles that are "queer" in the sense of the real people in the world who really identify as queer. Yes, it's a bit of an umbrella, but it isn't that big an umbrella. And even if it was, that would not actually excuse playing a trans guy, which is not just some ambiguous thing under the queer umbrella but a specific identity that she has not expressed any personal relationship with.
      posted by Sequence at 9:56 AM on July 9, 2018 [18 favorites]


      Yeah I¡¯m way into posthumanism as a thing but in no way at all does that intersect with how I¡¯m trans and no no no posthumanist literature treats trans people like we are intellectual and literary backwaters that are at best pejoratively mentioned in the barest passing as backwards hot messes teeming with body modifying sex workers (see Ramez Naam¡¯s the nexus trilogy) or just completely elided.

      So no there is not even a remote thing of ¡°body queer¡± that actually exists in contemporary posthumanist SF literature that I am aware of, and in my opinion the genre is actively hostile towards queer people and should not be used as any kind of leverage to legitimize some kind of exploratory queerness that Scarlett Johansson is working through.

      Actual trans people involved in posthumanist literature write things like sense8 and the matrix.
      posted by nikaspark at 10:04 AM on July 9, 2018 [10 favorites]


      > when all of these are characters that you've also identified as either not-human or becoming not-human

      I did not intend to cause any new discomfort, I'm sorry. My personal experience with trans is, as nikaspark describes, total alienation from both cis and trans communities, as well as from my own body. "Alien" and "robot" are frequent self-descriptors. I apologize for derailing and will leave the thread.
      posted by crysflame at 10:06 AM on July 9, 2018 [5 favorites]


      I get that crysflame, in the future my advice is speak of your own experiences with body alienation and identify with literature however you need in order to to find yourself but don¡¯t project queeeness onto other people when you¡¯re really finding it within yourself. You don¡¯t need to leave the thread either.
      posted by nikaspark at 10:11 AM on July 9, 2018 [7 favorites]


      You know what is literally slowly killing me inside, anem0ne is how I as a queer and trans person actually do have really valuable creative gifts to give the entire world that are good and meaningful and important and fucking urgently needed. Yet looking at the trendlines of history, I'm gonna die invisible (hopefully of old age) and most likely the creative body of my life's work will be erased and reduced to queer ephemera that survives in random patches and most likely lost forever.

      Erasure fucking hurts. I cried on the tube after the Pride in London afterparties because I saw what could have been and went by myself alone to a hotel realizing I'm just another wayward queer who will once again be invisible to world come Sunday morning.
      posted by nikaspark at 11:08 AM on July 9, 2018 [21 favorites]


      Y'all.... Ghost in the Shell flopped. ScarJo is not exactly a superstar here.

      The thing that infuriates me the most is that even if she was trying to use what negligible star power she has, she didn't have to play or misgender Tex Gill. They could have made the girlfriend the lead and cast a trans actor as Tex. They could have taken the bare bones concept of the story and not fundamentally disrespected a real life trans man's life and identity. Instead, they chose... this.
      posted by storytam at 10:03 PM on July 9, 2018 [4 favorites]


      How does it make sense to have her play someone 'short and dumpy' and masculine?

      Do you remember the discussion around how pretty cis women needed to "go ugly" to get an Oscar? ScarJo and her agents likely see playing such a character as "going ugly." It's all very fucked.
      posted by Anonymous at 10:20 PM on July 9, 2018


      How does it make sense to have her play someone 'short and dumpy' and masculine?

      Do you remember the discussion around how pretty cis women needed to "go ugly" to get an Oscar? ScarJo and her agents likely see playing such a character as "going ugly." It's all very fucked.


      Given what happened with Lalaland/Moonlight I hope that how it plays out is that there's "buzz" about her clinching an award and everyone being unhappy about it but possibly resigned and then surprise, the movie is blackballed and doesn't even get a single nomination.

      Given that Time's Up was founded by a bunch of Hollywood actresses and they have been critical about this, I have a sliver of hope.
      posted by like_neon at 8:44 AM on July 10, 2018


      trans people: If you are like me and read comments as a form of self harm that is hard to control, please practice extreme self care when reading the comments on the instagram link. I love you all and hugs are available if needed.
      posted by nikaspark at 9:06 AM on July 10, 2018 [2 favorites]


      (the comment section on that link is actually pretty good, but still things can get unpredictable out there...)
      posted by nikaspark at 9:08 AM on July 10, 2018


      If they need the draw of Scarlett Johannson she could play Tex Gill's wife, Cynthia Bruno.

      An excellent point - see also Reese Witherspoon winning an Oscar for playing June Cash in Walk the Line.

      Actual trans people involved in posthumanist literature write things like sense8...

      And now I have a sad, because I miss Sense8 a lot. It was a marvelous thing of beauty and color.
      posted by Sparx at 3:14 PM on July 10, 2018 [1 favorite]


      > If I listen only to what people tell me and don't listen to my near life-destroying dysphoria, I am a trans person who has apparently achieved this "goal". Based on my experiences it is a consolation prize that erases my actual gender experience by defaulting me into cis which in turn alienates me from trans communities and cis communities, affords me the privilege of not getting harassed or attacked in broad daylight by strangers, has made my career easier (that's a huge privilege and one I recognize dearly) and at the end of the day effectively renders me into a pretty looking ghost who traded one inauthentic life for another.

      nikaspark, hugs from across the internet. Don't let the bastards,dysphoria, or impostor-syndrome grind you down.
      posted by desuetude at 7:27 AM on July 11, 2018 [1 favorite]


      Yeah, when the backlash starts to threaten her big MCU blockbuster that just landed a director.

      Utterly garbage non-apology of a statement, too. "I understand why many feel he should be portrayed by a transgender person ... I believe that all artists should be considered equally and fairly." No, they shouldn't, that's the whole fucking point.
      posted by kafziel at 1:15 PM on July 13, 2018 [6 favorites]


      I am thankful that this casting debate, albeit controversial, has sparked a larger conversation about diversity and representation in film

      I don't really give a damn that she's thankful, much like I didn't give a damn how good Eddie Redmayne felt about raising awareness of trans people. I really give zero shits how cis people feel in this regard.

      How about this: FUCKING START LISTENING TO TRANS PEOPLE and don't pull this bullshit in the first place.

      I am not thankful.
      posted by nikaspark at 1:24 PM on July 13, 2018 [10 favorites]


      Wow. I'm surprised she stepped down. But I'm glad. Here's hoping more people from the LGBTQ community get a chance to put their foot in the door of Hollywood and make their mark. And that people realize representation matters.
      posted by Fizz at 5:06 AM on July 14, 2018


      Gavia Baker-Whitelaw at The Daily Dot How Scarlett Johansson alienated Black Widow¡¯s feminist fanbase
      posted by oh yeah! at 7:47 AM on July 14, 2018


      I'm a bit meh about her apology. As I said to my partner, I wonder if she wrote it, or if her PR folks wrote it.

      Some people on Tumblr have pointed out that the announcement of Johansson stepping down from Rub & Tug came shortly after the announcement that a director had been chosen for the Black Widow movie, and that the two are almost certainly related. I'm inclined to agree. Not that I think Marvel vetoed it for ethical reasons, just that she's more contractually obligated to them so Marvel would be the winner in any schedule conflict. I'm glad she's backed out of the role, but I don't really believe she would have done it without having another project lined up. The window for action-heroine-blockbuster roles is smaller than the window for leading-actress-Oscar-bait roles.
      posted by oh yeah! at 8:21 AM on July 14, 2018 [3 favorites]


      How long are you planning on living?
      posted by Dysk at 2:26 AM on July 15, 2018 [2 favorites]


      ¡®Rub & Tug¡¯: Don¡¯t Let Scarlett Johansson Dropping Out Kill Hollywood¡¯s First Trans Studio Film ¡ª Opinion
      posted by sammyo at 4:42 AM on July 18, 2018


      If Rub & Tug counts as a studio film (being by a production company who have a limited partnership with a major studio, not by a major studio or wholly-owned subsidiary themselves), then so does The Danish Girl. It could still theoretically be the first good Hollywood studio film about a trans person, but it's a few years too late to be the first.

      I still find the emphasis on "find a TRANS person not a CIS person for the role!" a bit off-putting. The biggest problem with Johansson wasn't that she is cis. It's that she is a woman. Even the above linked piece suggests finding a trans man or gender non-conforming actor. I get that there probably aren't a lot of parts for non-binary people, but it would also be cool to maybe not collapse all trans identities into "gender non-conforming" especially given that Dante's life would strongly suggest an unequivocally male identity.
      posted by Dysk at 5:06 AM on July 18, 2018 [1 favorite]


      ¡®Rub & Tug¡¯ Reportedly Not Moving Forward Due To Scarlett Johansson Departure
      posted by sammyo at 12:47 PM on July 18, 2018 [2 favorites]


      « Older Counterfeit Queen of Soul   |   Two articles about nothing Newer »


      This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments




      ¡°Why?¡± asked Larry, in his practical way. "Sergeant," admonished the Lieutenant, "you mustn't use such language to your men." "Yes," accorded Shorty; "we'll git some rations from camp by this evenin'. Cap will look out for that. Meanwhile, I'll take out two or three o' the boys on a scout into the country, to see if we can't pick up something to eat." Marvor, however, didn't seem satisfied. "The masters always speak truth," he said. "Is this what you tell me?" MRS. B.: Why are they let, then? My song is short. I am near the dead. So Albert's letter remained unanswered¡ªCaro felt that Reuben was unjust. She had grown very critical of him lately, and a smarting dislike coloured her [Pg 337]judgments. After all, it was he who had driven everybody to whatever it was that had disgraced him. He was to blame for Robert's theft, for Albert's treachery, for Richard's base dependence on the Bardons, for George's death, for Benjamin's disappearance, for Tilly's marriage, for Rose's elopement¡ªit was a heavy load, but Caro put the whole of it on Reuben's shoulders, and added, moreover, the tragedy of her own warped life. He was a tyrant, who sucked his children's blood, and cursed them when they succeeded in breaking free. "Tell my lord," said Calverley, "I will attend him instantly." HoME²Ô¾®¿Õ·¬ºÅѸÀ×Á´½Ó ENTER NUMBET 0017
      zengjia8.com.cn
      www.hojy.com.cn
      zswxdd.com.cn
      yanmi6.net.cn
      www.wenke5.com.cn
      aigson.com.cn
      www.cunju4.com.cn
      www.alphatrend.com.cn
      49yf.org.cn
      www.10webfind.com.cn
      成人图片四月色月阁 美女小美操逼 综合图区亚洲 苍井空的蓝色天空 草比wang WWW.BBB471.COM WWW.76UUU.COM WWW.2BQVOD.COM WWW.BASHAN.COM WWW.7WENTA.COM WWW.EHU8.COM WWW.XFW333.COM WWW.XF234.COM WWW.XIXILU9.COM WWW.0755MSX.NET WWW.DGFACAI.COM WWW.44DDYY.COM WWW.1122DX.COM WWW.YKB168.COM WWW.FDJWG.COM WWW.83CCCC.COM WWW.7MTP.COM WWW.NXL7.COM WWW.UZPLN.COM WWW.SEA0362.NET WWW.LUYHA.COM WWW.IXIAWAN.COM WWW.HNJXSJ.COM WWW.53PY.COM WWW.HAOYMAO.COM WWW.97PPP.COM 医网性交动态图 龙腾视频网 骚姐av男人天堂444ckcom wwwvv854 popovodcom sss色手机观看 淫荡之妇 - 百度 亚洲人兽交欧美A片 色妹妹wwwsemm22com 人妻激情p 狼国48Q 亚洲成人理论网 欧美男女av影片 家庭乱伦无需任何播放器在线播放 妩媚的尼姑 老妇成人图片大全 舔姐姐的穴 纯洁小处男 pu285ftp 大哥撸鲁鲁修 咪米色网站 丝袜美腿18P 晚上碰上的足交视频 avav9898 狠狠插影院免费观看所视频有电影 熟女良家p 50s人体 幼女av电影资源种子 小说家庭乱伦校园春色 丝袜美女做爱图片 影音先锋强奸影片 裸贷视频在线观 校园春色卡通动漫的 搜索wwwhuangtvcom 色妹影视 戊人网站 大阴茎男人性恋色网 偷拍自怕台湾妹 AV视频插进去 大胆老奶奶妈妈 GoGo全球高清美女人体 曼娜回忆录全文 上海东亚 舔柯蓝的脚 3344d最近十天更新 av在线日韩有码 强奸乱伦性爱淫秽 淫女谁 2233p 123aaaa查询 福利AV网站 世界黄色网址 弟姐撸人人操 婷婷淫色色淫 淫姐姐手机影院 一个释放的蝌蚪窝超碰 成人速播视频 爱爱王国 黄色一级片影视 夫妻主奴五月天 先锋撸撸吧 Xxoo88 与奶奶的激情 我和老女人美妙经历 淫妻色五月 zaiqqc 和姐姐互舔15p 色黄mp4 先锋2018资源 seoquentetved2k 嫩妹妹色妹妹干妹妹 欧美性爱3751www69nnnncom 淫男乱女小说 东方在线Av成人撸一撸 亚洲成人av伦理 四虎影视二级 3p性交 外国人妖口交性交黑人J吧插女人笔视观看 黑道总裁 人人x艹 美女大战大黑吊 神马电影伦理武则天 大鸡八插进的戏 爆操情人 热颜射国产 真实自拍足交 偷拍萝莉洗澡无码视频 哥哥狠狠射狠狠爱 欲体焚情搜狗 妹子啪啪网站 jizzroutn 平井绘里在线观看 肏男女 五月天逍遥社区 网站 私色房综合网成人网 男人和女人caobi 成人共享网站 港台三级片有逼吗 淫龙之王小说 惠美里大战黑人 我为美女姐姐口交 乱论色站 西田麻衣大胆的人体艺术 亚洲 包射网另类酷文在线 就爱白白胖胖大屁股在线播放 欧美淫妻色色色 奥蕾人艺术全套图片 台湾中学生门ed2k 2013国产幼门 WWW_66GGG_COM WWW_899VV_COM 中国老女人草比 qingse9 nvtongtongwaiyintou 哥哥妹妹性爱av电影 欧美和亚洲裸体做爱 肏胖骚屄 美国十此次先锋做爱影视 亚里沙siro 爆操人妻少妇 性交的骚妇 百度音影动漫美女窝骚 WWW_10XXOO_COM 哥两撸裸体图片 香洪武侠电影 胖美奈 我和女儿日屄 上海礼仪小姐 紫微斗数全书 优酷视频联盟 工作压力大怎么办 成人动漫edk 67ijcom WWW15NVNVCOM 东京热逼图 狠狠干自拍 第五色宗 少妇的b毛 t56人体艺术大胆人体模特 大黄狗与美女快播播放 美女露屄禁图 大胆内射少妇 十二种屄 苍井空绿色大战 WWWAFA789COM 淫老婆3p 橹二哥影院影视先锋 日本h动漫继母在线观看 淫乱村庄 强奸少妇采花魔 小泽玛莉亚乱伦电影 婷婷五月红成人网 我爱色洞洞 和老婆日屄图片 哪个网站能看到李宗瑞全集 操小姨的穴 白洁亚洲图片 亚洲色图淫荡内射美女 国外孕妇radio 哪本小说里有个金瓶经的拉完屎扣扣屁眼闻俩下 在线亚洲邪恶图 快播最新波哆野结依 wwwgigi22com 操紧身妹 丁香五月哥 欧美强奸幼童下载wwwgzyunhecom 撸波波rrr777 淫兽传 水淫穴 哥哥干巨乳波霸中文字幕 母子相奸AV视频录像 淫荡的制服丝袜妈妈 有强奸内容的小黄文 哪里艺术片 刘嘉玲人体艺术大胆写真 www婷婷五月天5252bocom 美女护士动态图片 教师制服诱惑a 黄色激情校园小说 怡红院叶子喋 棚户区嫖妓pronhub 肏逼微博 wwppcc777 vns56666com 色哥哥色妹妹内射 ww99anan 清纯秀气的学生妹喝醉 短头发撸碰 苍井空一级片tupian 够爽影院女生 鲁大娘久草 av淘之类的网站 谷露AV日本AV韩国AV 电台有声小说 丽苑春色 小泽玛利亚英语 bl动漫h网 色谷歌短片 免费成人电影 台湾女星综合网 美眉骚导航(荐) 岛国爱情动作片种子 兔牙喵喵在线观看影院 五月婷婷开心之深深爱一本道 动漫福利啪啪 500导航 自拍 综合 dvdes664影音先锋在线观看 水岛津实透明丝袜 rrav999 绝色福利导航视频 200bbb 同学聚会被轮奸在线视频 性感漂亮的保健品推销员上门推销套套和延迟剂时被客户要求当场实验效果操的 羞羞影院每日黄片 小黄视频免费观看在线播放 日本涩青视频 日本写真视频 日本女人大尺度裸体操逼视频 日韩电影网 日本正在播放女教师 在线观看国产自拍 四虎官方影库 男男a片 小武妈妈 人妻免费 视频日本 日本毛片免费视频观看51影院 波多野结衣av医院百度网盘 秋假影院美国影阮日本 1亚欧成人小视频 奇怪美发沙龙店2莉莉影院 av无码毛片 丝袜女王调教的网站有哪些 2499在线观视频免费观看 约炮少妇视频 上床A级片 美尻 无料 w字 主播小电影视频在线观看 自拍性porn 伦理片日本猜人电影 初犬 无码 特级毛片影谍 日日在线操小妹视频 日本无码乱论视频 kinpatu86 在线 欧美色图狠狠插 唐朝AV国产 校花女神肛门自慰视频 免费城人网站 日产午夜影院 97人人操在线视频 俺来也还有什么类似的 caopron网页 HND181 西瓜影音 阿v天堂网2014 秋霞eusses极速播放 柳州莫菁第6集 磁力链 下载丝袜中文字 IPZ-694 ftp 海牙视频成人 韩国出轨漫画无码 rbd561在线观看 色色色 magnet 冲田杏梨爆乳女教师在线 大桃桃(原蜜桃Q妹)最新高清大秀两套6V XXX日本人体艺术三人 城市雄鹰。你个淫娃 久久最新国产动漫在线 A级高清免费一本道 人妻色图 欧美激情艳舞视频 草莓在线看视频自拍 成电人影有亚洲 ribrngaoqingshipin 天天啪c○m 浣肠video在线观看 天堂av无码av欧美av免费看电影 ftxx00 大香蕉水 吉里吉里电影网 日本三级有码视频 房事小视频。 午午西西影院 国内自拍主播 冲田爱佳 经典拳交视频最新在线视频 怡红影晥免费普通用户 青娱乐综合在线观看 藏经阁成人 汤姆影视avtom wwWff153CoM 一本道小视频免费 神马影影院大黄蜂 欧美老人大屁股在线 四级xf 坏木啪 冲田杏梨和黑人bt下载 干莉莉 桃乃木香奈在线高清ck 桑拿888珠海 家庭乱伦视频。 小鸟酱自慰视频在线观看 校园春色 中文字幕 性迷宫0808 迅雷资源来几个 小明看看永久免费视频2 先锋hunta资源 国产偷拍天天干 wwwsezyz4qiangjianluanlun 婷婷五月社区综合 爸爸你的鸡巴太大轻点我好痛 农村妇女买淫视屏 西瓜网赤井美月爆乳女子在校生 97无码R级 日本图书馆暴力强奸在线免费 巨乳爱爱在线播放 ouzouxinjiao 黄色国产视频 成人 自拍 超碰 在线 腿绞论坛 92福利电影300集 人妻x人妻动漫在线 进入 91视频 会计科目汇总表人妻x人妻动漫在线 激情上位的高颜值小少妇 苹果手机能看的A片 一本道av淘宝在线 佐藤美纪 在线全集 深夜成人 国内自拍佛爷在线 国内真实换妻现场实拍自拍 金瓶梅漫画第九话无码 99操人人操 3737电影网手机在线载 91另类视频 微兔云 (指甲油) -(零食) ssni180迅雷中字 超清高碰视频免费观看 成人啪啪小视频网址 美女婶婶当家教在线观看 网红花臂纹身美女大花猫SM微拍视频 帅哥美女搞基在床上搞的视频下载东西 日本视频淫乱 av小视频av小电影 藤原辽子在线 川上优被强奸电影播放 长时间啊嗯哦视频 美女主播凌晨情趣套装开车,各种自·慰加舞技 佳色影院 acg乡村 国产系列欧美系列 本土成人线上免费影片 波罗野结衣四虎精品在线 爆乳幼稚园 国产自拍美女在线观看免插件 黑丝女优电影 色色的动漫视频 男女抽插激情视频 Lu69 无毛伦理 粉嫩少妇9P 欧美女人开苞视频 女同a级片 无码播放 偷拍自拍平板 天天干人人人人干 肏多毛的老女人 夜人人人视频 动漫女仆被揉胸视频 WWW2018AVCOM jizzjizzjizz马苏 巨乳潜入搜查官 藤浦惠在线观看 老鸹免费黄片 美女被操屄视频 美国两性 西瓜影音 毛片ok48 美国毛片基地A级e片 色狼窝图片网 泷泽乃南高清无码片 热热色源20在线观看 加勒比澳门网 经典伦理片abc 激情视频。app 三百元的性交动画 97爱蜜姚网 雷颖菲qq空间 激情床戏拍拍拍 luoli hmanh 男人叉女人视频直播软件 看美女搞基哪个app好 本网站受美坚利合众国 caobike在线视频发布站 女主播电击直肠两小时 狠狠干高清视频在线观看 女学生被强奸的视频软件 欧美喷水番号 欧美自拍视频 武侠古典伦理 m13113美女图片 日本波多野结衣三级无马 美女大桥AV隐退 在线中文字幕亚洲欧美飞机图 xxx,av720p iav国产自拍视频 国内偷拍视频在线 - 百度 国歌产成人网 韩国美女主播录制0821 韩国直播av性 fyeec日本 骚逼播放 偷拍你懂的网站 牡蛎写真视频 初川南个人资源 韩国夏娃 ftp 五十度飞2828 成人区 第五季 视频区 亚洲日韩 中文字幕 动漫 7m视频分类大全电影 动漫黄片10000部免费视频 我骚逼丝袜女网友给上了 日本女人的性生活和下水道囧图黄 肏婶骚屄 欧美美女性爰图 和美女明星做爱舒服吗 乱伦小说小姨 天天舅妈 日本极品淫妇美鲍人体艺术 黄色录像强奸片 逍遥仙境论坛最新地址 人插母动物 黄s页大全 亚洲无码电影网址 幼女乱伦电影 雯雅婷30p caopran在线视频 插b尽兴口交 张佰芝yinbu biantaicaobitupian 台湾18成人电影 勾引同学做爱 动态性交姿势图 日本性交图10p 操逼动态图大全 国产后入90后 quanjialuanlun 裸女条河图片种子 坚挺的鸡吧塞进少妇的骚穴 迅雷亚洲bt www56com 徐老板去农村玩幼女小说故事 大尺度床吻戏大全视频 wwwtp2008com 黑丝大奶av 口述与爸爸做爱 人兽完全插入 欧美大乳12p 77hp 教师 欧美免费黄色网 影音先锋干女人逼 田中瞳无码电影 男人与漂亮的小母 在线观看 朴妮唛骚逼 欧美性感骚屄浪女 a片马干人 藤原绘里香电影 草草逼网址 www46xxxcn 美女草屄图 色老太人体艺网 男人的大阴茎插屄 北京违章车辆查询 魅影小说 滨岛真绪zhongzi 口比一级片 国产a片电影在线播放 小说我给男友刮毛 做爱视屏 茜木铃 开心四色播播网影视先锋 影音先锋欧美性爱人与兽 激情撸色天天草 插小嫚逼电影 人与动物三客优 日本阴部漫画美女邪恶图裸体护士美女露阴部 露屄大图 日韩炮图图片 欧美色图天天爱打炮 咪咕网一路向西国语 一级激情片 我爱看片av怎么打不开 偷拍自拍影先锋芳芳影院 性感黑丝高跟操逼 女性阴部摄影图片 自拍偷拍作爱群交 我把大姨给操了 好色a片 大鸡吧黄片 操逼和屁眼哪个爽 先生肉感授业八木梓 国产电影色图 色吧色吧图片 祖母乱伦片 强悍的老公搞了老婆又搞女儿影音先锋 美女战黑人大鸟五月 我被大鸡吧狂草骚穴 黄狗猪性交妇 我爱少女的逼 伦理苍井空百度影音 三姨妈的肥 国产成人电影有哪些 偷拍自拍劲爆欧美 公司机WWW日本黄色 无遮挡AV片 sRAV美女 WLJEEE163com 大鸡巴操骚12p 我穿着黑丝和哥哥干 jiujiucaojiujiucao 澳门赌场性交黄色免费视频 sifangplanxyz 欧美人兽交asianwwwzooasiancomwwwzootube8com 地狱少女新图 美女和黄鳝xxx doingit电影图片 香港性爱电影盟 av电影瑜伽 撸尔山乱伦AV 天天天天操极品好身材 黑人美女xxoo电影 极品太太 制服诱惑秘书贴吧 阿庆淫传公众号 国产迟丽丽合集 bbw热舞 下流番号 奥门红久久AV jhw04com 香港嫩穴 qingjunlu3最新网 激情做爱动画直播 老师大骚逼 成人激情a片干充气娃娃的视频 咪图屋推女郎 AV黄色电影天堂 aiai666top 空姐丝袜大乱11p 公公大鸡巴太大了视频 亚洲午夜Av电影 兰桂坊女主播 百度酷色酷 龙珠h绿帽 女同磨豆腐偷拍 超碰男人游戏 人妻武侠第1页 中国妹妹一级黄片 电影女同性恋嘴舔 色秀直播间 肏屄女人的叫声录音 干她成人2oP 五月婷婷狼 那里可以看国内女星裸照 狼友最爱操逼图片 野蛮部落的性生活 人体艺术摄影37cc 欧美色片大色站社区 欧美性爱喷 亚洲无码av欧美天堂网男人天堂 黑人黄色网站 小明看看主 人体艺术taosejiu 1024核工厂xp露出激情 WWWDDFULICOM 粉嫩白虎自慰 色色帝国PK视频 美国搔女 视频搜索在线国产 小明算你狠色 七夜郎在线观看 亚洲色图欧美色图自拍偷拍视频一区视频二区 pyp影yuan 我操网 tk天堂网 亚洲欧美射图片65zzzzcom 猪jb 另类AV南瓜下载 外国的人妖网站 腐女幼幼 影音先锋紧博资源 快撸网87 妈妈5我乱论 亚洲色~ 普通话在线超碰视频下载 世界大逼免费视频 先锋女优图片 搜索黄色男的操女人 久久女优播免费的 女明星被P成女优 成人三级图 肉欲儿媳妇 午夜大片厂 光棍电影手机观看小姨子 偷拍自拍乘人小说 丝袜3av网 Qvodp 国产女学生做爱电影 第四色haoav 催眠赵奕欢小说 色猫电影 另类性爱群交 影像先锋 美女自慰云点播 小姨子日B乱伦 伊人成人在线视频区 干表姐的大白屁股 禁室义母 a片丝袜那有a片看a片东京热a片q钬 香港经典av在线电影 嫩紧疼 亚洲av度 91骚资源视频免费观看 夜夜日夜夜拍hhh600com 欧美沙滩人体艺术图片wwwymrtnet 我给公公按摩 吉沢明涉av电影 恋夜秀晨间电影 1122ct 淫妻交换长篇连载 同事夫妇淫乱大浑战小说 kk原创yumi www774n 小伙干美国大乳美女magnet 狗鸡巴插骚穴小说 七草千岁改名微博 满18周岁可看爱爱色 呱呱下载 人妻诱惑乱伦电影 痴汉图书馆5小说 meinvsextv www444kkggcom AV天堂手机迅雷下载 干大姨子和二姨子 丝袜夫人 qingse 肥佬影音 经典乱伦性爱故事 日日毛资源站首页 美国美女裸体快播 午夜性交狂 meiguomeishaonvrentiyishu 妹妹被哥哥干出水 东莞扫黄女子图片 带毛裸照 zipailaobishipin 人体艺术阴部裸体 秘密 强奸酒醉大奶熟女无码全集在线播放 操岳母的大屄 国产少妇的阴毛 影音先锋肥熟老夫妻 女人潮吹视频 骚老师小琪迎新舞会 大奶女友 杨幂不雅视频种子百度贴吧 53kk 俄罗斯骚穴 国模 露逼图 李宗瑞78女友名单 二级片区视频观看 爸爸妈妈的淫荡性爱 成人电影去也 华我想操逼 色站图片看不了 嫖娼色 肛交lp 强奸乱伦肏屄 肥穴h图 岳母 奶子 妈妈是av女星 淫荡性感大波荡妇图片 欧美激情bt专区论坛 晚清四大奇案 日啖荔枝三百颗作者 三国防沉迷 印度新娘大结局 米琪人体艺术 夜夜射婷婷色在线视频 www555focom 台北聚色网 搞穴影音先锋 美吻影院超体 女人小穴很很日 老荡妇高跟丝袜足交 越南大胆室内人体艺术 翔田千里美图 樱由罗种子 美女自摸视频下载 香港美女模特被摸内逼 朴麦妮高清 亚寂寞美女用手指抠逼草莓 波多野结衣无码步兵在线 66女阴人体图片 吉吉影音最新无码专区 丝袜家庭教师种子 黄色网站名jane 52av路com 爱爱谷色导航网 阳具冰棒 3334kco 最大胆的人体摄影网 哥哥去在线乱伦文学 婶婶在果园里把我了 wagasetu 我去操妹 点色小说激 色和哥哥 吴清雅艳照 白丝护士ed2k 乱伦小说综合资源网 soso插插 性交抽插图 90后艳照门图片 高跟鞋97色 美女美鲍人体大胆色图 熟女性交bt 百度美女裸体艺术作品 铃木杏里高潮照片图 洋人曹比图 成人黄色图片电影网 幼幼女性性交 性感护士15p 白色天使电影 下载 带性视频qq 操熟女老师 亚洲人妻岛国线播放 虐待荡妇老婆 中国妈妈d视频 操操操成人图片 大阴户快操我 三级黄图片欣赏 jiusetengmuziluanlun p2002午夜福 肉丝一本道黑丝3p性爱 美丽叔母强奸乱伦 偷拍强奸轮奸美女短裙 日本女人啪啪网址 岛国调教magnet 大奶美女手机图片 变态强奸视频撸 美女与色男15p 巴西三级片大全 苍井空点影 草kkk 激情裸男体 东方AV在线岛国的搬运工下载 青青草日韩有码强奸视频 霞理沙无码AV磁力 哥哥射综合视频网 五月美女色色先锋 468rccm www色红尘com av母子相奸 成人黄色艳遇 亚洲爱爱动漫 干曰本av妇女 大奶美女家教激情性交 操丝袜嫩b 有声神话小说 小泽玛利亚迅雷 波多野结衣thunder 黄网色中色 www访问www www小沈阳网com 开心五月\u0027 五月天 酒色网 秘密花园 淫妹影院 黄黄黄电影 救国p2p 骚女窝影片 处女淫水乱流 少女迷奸视频 性感日本少妇 男人的极品通道 色系军团 恋爱操作团 撸撸看电影 柳州莫菁在线视频u 澳门娱银河成人影视 人人莫人人操 西瓜视频AV 欧美av自拍 偷拍 三级 狼人宝鸟视频下载 妹子漏阴道不打码视频 国产自拍在线不用 女牛学生破处視频 9877h漫 七色沙耶香番号 最新国产自拍 福利视频在线播放 青青草永久在线视频2 日本性虐电影百度云 pppd 481 snis939在线播放 疯狂性爱小视频精彩合集推荐 各种爆操 各种场所 各式美女 各种姿势 各式浪叫 各种美乳 谭晓彤脱黑奶罩视频 青青草伊人 国内外成人免费影视 日本18岁黄片 sese820 无码中文字幕在线播放2 - 百度 成语在线av 奇怪美发沙龙店2莉莉影院 1人妻在线a免费视频 259luxu在线播放 大香蕉综合伊人网在线影院 国模 在线视频 国产 同事 校园 在线 浪荡女同做爱 healthonline899 成人伦理 mp4 白合野 国产 迅雷 2018每日在线女优AV视频 佳AV国产AV自拍日韩AV视频 色系里番播放器 有没有在线看萝莉处女小视频的网站 高清免费视频任你搞伦理片 温泉伦理按摸无码 PRTD-003 时间停止美容院 计女影院 操大白逼baby操作粉红 ak影院手机版 91老司机sm 毛片基地成人体验区 dv1456 亚洲无限看片区图片 abp582 ed2k 57rrrr新域名 XX局长饭局上吃饱喝足叫来小情人当众人面骑坐身上啪啪 欲脱衣摸乳给众人看 超震撼 处女在线免费黄色视频 大香巨乳家政爱爱在线 吹潮野战 处女任务坉片 偷拍视频老夫妻爱爱 yibendaoshipinzhaixian 小川阿佐美再战 内人妻淫技 magnet 高老庄八戒影院 xxxooo日韩 日韩av12不卡超碰 逼的淫液 视频 黎明之前 ftp 成人电影片偷拍自拍 久久热自拍偷在线啪啪无码 2017狼人干一家人人 国产女主播理论在线 日本老黄视频网站 少妇偷拍点播在线 污色屋在线视频播放 狂插不射 08新神偷古惑仔刷钱BUG 俄罗斯强姦 在线播放 1901福利性爱 女人59岁阴部视频 国产小视频福利在线每天更新 教育网人体艺术 大屁股女神叫声可射技术太棒了 在线 极品口暴深喉先锋 操空姐比 坏木啪 手机电影分分钟操 jjzyjj11跳转页 d8视频永久视频精品在线 757午夜视频第28集 杉浦花音免费在线观看 学生自拍 香蕉视频看点app下载黄色片 2安徽庐江教师4P照片 快播人妻小说 国产福二代少妇做爱在线视频 不穿衣服的模特58 特黄韩国一级视频 四虎视频操逼小段 干日本妇妇高清 chineseloverhomemade304 av搜搜福利 apaa-186 magnet 885459com63影院 久久免费视怡红院看 波多野结衣妻ネトリ电影 草比视频福利视频 国人怡红院 超碰免费chaopeng 日本av播放器 48qa,c 超黄色裸体男女床上视频 PPPD-642 骑马乳交插乳抽插 JULIA 最后是厉害的 saob8 成人 inurl:xxx 阴扩 成八动漫AV在线 shawty siri自拍在线 成片免费观看大香蕉 草莓100社区视频 成人福利软件有哪些 直播啪啪啪视频在线 成人高清在线偷拍自拍视频网站 母女午夜快播 巨乳嫩穴影音先锋在线播放 IPZ-692 迅雷 哺乳期天天草夜夜夜啪啪啪视频在线 孩子放假前与熟女的最后一炮 操美女25p freex性日韩免费视频 rbd888磁力链接 欧美美人磁力 VR视频 亚洲无码 自拍偷拍 rdt在线伦理 日本伦理片 希崎杰西卡 被迫服从我的佐佐凌波在线观看 葵つか步兵在线 东方色图, 69堂在线视频 人人 abp356百度云 江媚玲三级大全 开心色导 大色哥网站 韩国短发电影磁力 美女在线福利伦理 亚洲 欧美 自拍在线 限制级福利视频第九影院 美女插鸡免得视频 泷泽萝拉第四部第三部我的邻居在线 色狼窝综合 美国少妇与水电工 火影忍者邪恶agc漫画纲手邪恶道 近亲乱伦视频 金卡戴珊视频门百度云 极虎彯院 日本 母乳 hd 视频 爆米花神马影院伦理片 国产偷拍自拍丝袜制服无码性交 璩美凤光碟完整版高清 teen萝莉 国产小电影kan1122 日日韩无码中文亚洲在线视频六区第6 黄瓜自卫视频激情 红番阔午夜影院 黄色激情视频网视频下载 捆梆绳模羽洁视频 香蕉视频页码 土豆成人影视 东方aⅴ免费观看p 国内主播夫妻啪啪自拍 国内网红主播自拍福利 孩子强奸美女软件 廿夜秀场面业影院 演员的诞生 ftp 迷奸系列番号 守望人妻魂 日本男同调教播放 porn三级 magnet 午夜丁香婷婷 裸卿女主播直播视频在线 ac制服 mp4 WWW_OSION4YOU_COM 90后人体艺术网 狠狠碰影音先锋 美女秘书加班被干 WWW_BBB4444_COM vv49情人网 WWW_XXX234_COM 黄色xxoo动态图 人与动物性交乱伦视频 屄彩图